WOODWARD FAMILY TREE                                                                 
IGI Family Search
National Burial Index


Home page

What's new
Origin of the name

Family members

Family tree
Related families
Places they lived

A guide to baptisms
A guide to marriages
A guide to burials
A guide to the calendar

  A Guide to Church Baptisms

Photograph of a font in a church Parish records started in 1538, but only about 800 registers have survived from this date. The records began with the use of single sheets of paper, but from 1598 books were introduced under an Order made by Queen Elizabeth I.

Only the paper entries from 1558 onwards (the start of Elizabeth's reign) were copied into the new books, which means that in many parishes the records for the period 1538 to 1558 have been lost.

The clergy also had to send a copy of the parish record to the Bishop every year. This copy is known as 'The Bishop's Transcript'. These were supposed to be prepared alongside the parish register, but often this didn't happen

In some parishes the Bishop's copy was the original record with the parish record being updated later. In other parishes it was the other way around; it was down to the individual clergy. Making up the record at a later date naturally resulted in errors and omissions. For this reason if you can't find a record in the parish record you should always check the Bishop's Transcript as well.

In order to know where to look in the records and understand what the records tell us, we need to have some understanding of the scale of English society, the way people lived and how their need to find work, even into old age, affected where their children were baptised.


The Domesday Book tells us that in 1087 AD there were 2053 churches in England and 268,125 rural households. The best estimates based on the book put the population of England in 1087 at just under 1.5 million. The book shows that at the time of the Conquest, 89% of the population lived in the rural environment whereas by the year 2000 the exact opposite was the case (89% lived in urban areas). The coming of the railways in the 1840s and 1850s meant that for the first time families could move considerable distances to find work and the census returns from 1851 onwards show this migration by including the county or place of birth.

One thing to bear in mind is that children were not always baptised in the same village or town where they were born. Most first born children were baptised in the mother's home parish, but second and subsequent children were usually christened in the parish in which the parents lived. Also, the average age at baptism increased from one week old in the middle of the 17th century to one month old by the middle of the 19th century.

A birth to a woman aged over 40 years was not unknown, but was uncommon. Rare cases of women aged 48 have been found, but in most cases the fertility period was up to age 41 or 42. Women who had their first child in their mid thirties were at far greater risk of death in childbirth, and if you cannot find any more children baptised to a couple it is worth looking for a death of the mother soon after a baptism of the (last) child.

The average number of children born to each family (called the Total Fertility Rate) was determined by many factors, and heavily influenced by the average age of marriage for women. In the 1700s, the average age at marriage for labouring class women was 26 years, resulting in a total fertility rate of 5 (ie. five children born during a 16 year fertitlity period up to age 42). Clearly some couples had much larger families, but five is the average for the 18th century, with a small increase in the 19th century due to the better survival rate of children. Family size was also affected by average life expectancy of the parents, particularly the husband. In the 18th century this was mid-to-high thirties for men, rising to low forties after 1800 where it stayed until the late 19th century.

So, when looking for children born to a particular couple all these factors must be considered, and don't dismiss children born to what appears to be an older woman if all the other indicators suggest he/she is from the same family.

Early baptism records

Records from the 16th, 17th and early 18th century often include only the child's name and the father's name. A typical example would be


The age of a person being baptised wasn't normally shown until 1813 onwards when George Rose's Act compelled vicars to use a new record book. Adults were sometimes baptised when they joined the church for the first time or before getting married, as some vicars insisted that they be 'brought into the church' before he would marry them. 

From the late 16th century onwards, a number of Protestant nonconformist churches began to emerge. These would often conduct their own baptisms, usually in secret. In addition, several Catholic priests performed baptisms in secret. Nonconformity was attacked by both the established church and the state until the Toleration Act of 1688 brought much of the persecution to an end. Nonconformity grew steadily and an increasing number of baptisms were carried out in nonconformist chapels and recorded in their registers. Non-conformist registers are only common after 1780 and relate to about 6% of all baptisms.

In the 1700s mobility was more common than we realise, especially for agricultural labourers. Many worked as journeymen - taken on for seasonal work, then moving to another village or estate later when the work dried up. Movement was usually contained within a twenty mile radius of a persons home or place of birth, although the building of the canals in the late 1700s and the railways in the mid 1800s opened up greater opportunities to find work further afield. Seasonal mobility affected where the children of a family were born and baptised and can result in records being overlooked on the basis that they are too far from 'home'.

Illegitimacy (birth to an unmarried mother) reached 5% in 1590, 6% by 1800 and 7% by 1845. Today it is 40%. Parish record entries of illegitimate children normally name only the mother. The name of the alleged father is sometimes added (as required by an Act of 1634) but not always, as often the mother refused to give the name. In most cases, before the advent of Social Security, it was the parish that had to support a woman and child who had no husband, and for this reason in 1733 the Bastardy Act ordered that fathers of illegitimate children should be committed to jail unless they made arrangements to indemnify the parish for the upkeep of the child. In most cases this forced men to marry the expectant mother. This may have been one reason why many women refused to name the father?

Often vicars refused to baptise illegitimate children, but those that were baptised were usually given the mother's surname. Illegitimacy may explain why you can't later find a baptism for an ancestor that you have a marriage record for. In some cases the father's surname was used as a middle christian name. One example on a tree of mine is a William Herbert Smith Baker born in 1857.

Missing records

Many baptism records were lost during the English Civil War. Between 1640 and 1660 it is estimated that one-sixth of all baptisms are missing from the records and many children were not baptised during this period, although a flood of baptisms took place after the Reformation in 1660. Additionally, records were lost through negligence on the part of the vicar, who failed to keep the books in good condition. Ironically many clergy changed the old wooden church chests for ones made of metal in the belief that they would better protect the contents, but as metal doesn't 'breath' like wood they retained the damp and the records were even more prone to damage.

The Parochial Registers and Records Measure 1978, required that all parish records over 100 years old and all registers starting 150 or more years earlier (with the exception of marriage registers from July 1837 onwards) be deposited with the Diocesan Record Office. In most cases the records were later moved to the County Record Offices. One original register I looked at for Morton Bagot in Warwickshire, a very small hamlet, had been started in 1665. The church only stopped using the book when new printed registers were introduced in 1813.

Infant mortality

Between 1700 and 1800, 5% of children died within the first few days of birth and 20% died before age 10 years. Many infants who died at birth or shortly afterwards were not baptised which may account for a long gap in a family tree. In wealthier families, some were baptised quickly if they thought the child would die, as this then allowed for a formal church burial. A gap in the regular two to three year birth cycle may also mean a stillbirth or miscarriage, (generally accepted as being before 24 weeks).

Two children of the same forename shown as being baptised to the same parents usually means the first child died. However, because family size was much larger than today (the average in 1850 was 6 children over a 15 year period but many families had 10 children) the first child may well have grown up and moved away by the time the last child was born, so using the same forename for two sons wasn't a problem. Also, wives of second marriages sometimes called their children by the same christian name as an older child from the husband's first marriage. However, these situations are quite rare. Whenever you do find this situation it is advisable to first check for a burial.

Dade registers

From around 1770 to the early 1800s many parishes, particularly in Yorkshire, adopted a style of register promoted by the Archbishop of York based on the ideas of William Dade, a Yorkshire clergyman. Dade registers for baptism entries usually record not only the name of the subject but also of the parents, including the mother's maiden name, and of the subject's grandparents, at least in the male line. Dade registers are therefore some of the most valuable records available. The introduction of printed forms in 1813 brought their use to an end.

Rose's Act 1812

George Rose's Act 1812 decreed that church incumbents were to keep two specially printed registers to record baptisms and burials separately. These were separate from the marriage register standardised by Hardwicke's Act 1753. From 1813 the new books had printed columns, and these are much easier to read. The new entries contain the names of both parents (where known) and the age of the child.

Civil Registration of Births 1837

The introduction of civil registration in 1837 had little effect on church baptisms as the act concentrated on births not the religious event known as baptism. Legally, all births must be registered within 42 days of the event, and it is a widespread misconception that many births were not registered under the new system. The true position is that the non-registration rate was very low, and that a later act in 1875 only changed who was responsible for registration. What is also the case is that by the latter part of the 20th century many children were not baptised, and the only record available became the civil registration of their birth.

Baptism Certificates

Children who were baptised were sometimes given a Baptism Certificate. A typical example from the 1950s is shown on the left.

These certificates were usually issued by the vicar after the ceremony, but today they can be printed by anyone, although to be authentic they must still be signed by the vicar. The certificate may be the only paper based proof of the event, as many parish records have been lost over the last three hundred years or so. They are not available from any record office or central place; they are normally only found in family chests or inside a family bible.

Baptism Certificates usually include information such as the individuals name, the date, and the church in which the ceremony took place. Some certificates also contain the age of the child at the time of the baptism, and in many cases this was the only place that the age was formally recorded. Often a certificate of baptism is required if you wish to get married in a Church and is also necessary if you choose to receive other sacraments, such as confirmation or communion.

The International Genealogical Index (IGI)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (the Mormon Church) has compiled the International Genealogical Index (IGI), an index of baptisms, marriages and deaths taken from information contained in the parish records. The index contains the names of over 400 million people baptised between 1550 - 1900. Copies on CD-Rom are usually available in most libraries and county record offices, but the index can also be accessed online (a link is available from the top-left-hand corner of this page).

The index is a wonderful aid to getting started. Using the search facility online you can look for baptisms in a wide range of parishes, based on the person's name. Using the Batch Number system, you can also discover all children of a single family that were baptised in a specific parish.

Beware, however, the IGI is only an index. Any database the size of the IGI will have errors and omissions, and all records must be verified from other (original) sources. However, the index will help you focus on which records to look at and genealogists owe a great debt to the Mormon's for this wonderful resource.

Ancestry online

Ancestry-dot-com has made researching our family history much easier, as many parish records and census returns are now available online and indexed by name. It is a great resource and well worth the subscription fee, but the database does not cover all parishes. Just because you cannot find an event on Ancestry does not mean that it didn't happen. In many cases a visit to the local records office to view the register will still be necessary.

In Ancestry, if you search the Card Catalogue and enter your chosen county, you can then see a list of all parish records available for that county. By selecting the parish you can trawl through the record itself rather than using the name index, which is very useful if you do not have much information about the person you are looking for.

Important point about the calendar

Up until 1752 in England, new years day was celebrated on 25th March not 1st January; eg. December 1750 would be followed immediately by January 1750. It is therefore easy to dismiss baptism records because they seem to be at the wrong time.

An example of how this can lead to a baptism being ignored would be where a couple were married in May 1750 and their first child was born 9 months later, ie. February 1750. The baptism would probably be in early March 1750, (what we would now call March 1751). On first sight the baptism would be ignored as being nearly three months before the parents were married and in the belief that the child belonged to another couple with the same christian names, when in fact it was perfectly in order.

The changeover to new years day being on 1st January is not such a problem when viewing the original church record, as the events are in the correct order in the parish record. For events that occurred during 1752 (the changeover year) you are sometimes alerted to the change by the date being recorded as 1751/2, but not always. When viewing the pages on a microfiche or CD Rom you may think that the pages have been photographed in the wrong order and the problem can be overlooked completely by accident when the events are listed in date order, such as with the International Genealogical Index (IGI).

Another problem is that in 1752, 11 days were removed from the calendar. This is because the old calendar used before 1752 was based on a year of 365.25 days, which was too long resulting in the calendar year becoming out of step with the solar year. The change to the new calendar (the Gregorian Calendar) meant that the 2nd September 1752 was followed immediately by the 14 September for that year alone. Consequently, there are no parish records for the period 3 September to 13 September 1752 (inclusive). (To find out more about how the calendar evolved see Calendar.htm)

One last piece of advice

Always, always make a note of any baptisms of people with the same surname that you come across in the records, even if you think they are not related to your family. Experience has shown that one day these seemingly unrelated records may well provide a vital link that otherwise could take years of research to find.

Sources: Family Tree Detective (Colin Rogers ISBN 0-7190-5213-0) ; The Dictionary of Genealogy by T Fitz-Hugh; Research paper 99/111 - A century of Change (since 1900) House of Commons library. The Economic History of Britain since 1700 - Floud & McCloskey (Cambridge University Press).